Saturday, February 27, 2016

Bangladesh now world's second largest knitted goods manufacturer

According to the Bangladesh Knitwear Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BKMEA), the country exported 7.78 billion pieces of knitted items such as T-shirts and sweaters in 2010 compared with Turkey's 7.74 billion pieces.
"We overtook Turkey as the world’s second largest knitwear manufacturer last year. Volume-wise, we are now only second to China," BKMEA first vice-president Md Habibur Rahman told the Financial Express.
Mr. Rahman said Turkey was still ahead of Bangladesh in terms of value as it exported knitted goods worth $6.92 billion last year, compared with Bangladesh's $6.19 billion.
"Our apparel export has been growing at an impressive 40% rate in the current fiscal year. If the growth continues at this rate, we can beat Turkey in values by next fiscal year," he said.
Mr. Rahman also said that Turkish knitted goods manufacturers produced high-value added products such as sportswear, catering to western fashion retailers, while Bangladesh mainly operated in low value products such as T-shirts.
"We are in the knitwear business since the 1990s. By contrast, Turkey has been a major garment maker since the Second World War. They don't take cheap orders because of high labour cost," he added.
According to the report, Turkey has also emerged as an important apparel market for Bangladesh in recent years with shipments peaking at 65% in 2009 to $108 million.
The report goes on to say that, despite steady erosion of its competitive advantages, China remains the world's largest knitwear (knit goods) and woven garment manufacturer, accounting for around half of the world's $500 billion apparel market.
- See more at: http://www.knittingindustry.com/bangladesh-now-worlds-second-largest-knitted-goods-manufacturer/#sthash.EtrBzx56.dpuf

Source:www.knittingindustry.com/bangladesh-now-worlds-second-largest-knitted-goods-manufacturer

Thursday, February 25, 2016

Why is a light colored T-shirt cooler to wear than a dark colored T-shirt?


Sunlight consists of a mixture of all visible wavelengths of electromagnetic radiation (light). When all visible wavelengths enter the eye simultaneously, the color white is perceived. Black is the absence of any light. Other colors are sensed when selected wavelengths are present--longer wavelengths are perceived as red, shorter ones as blue or violet. 

An object's color in the sun depends on which wavelengths it absorbs and, therefore, which are reflected away from the object. A shirt that appears red absorbs the shorter wavelengths and reflects longer ones. The reverse is true for a blue shirt. So while a white, or lighter colored, shirt REFLECTS most of the visible wavelengths it is exposed to, a black or dark shirt ABSORBS more wavelengths. Absorbed radiation is converted into heat, making the darker shirt warmer to wear.

Source: www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae80.cfm

Wednesday, February 24, 2016

What is the definition of GSM when purchasing fabric?

You’ve heard of a 50/50 or a 80/20 t-shirt. 50/50 means 50% cotton and 50% polyester or 80% cotton and 20% polyester, but have you ever seen the gsm listed and wondered what that meant? Simply put; that’s the weight of the fabric.

But first, it’s important to know that GSM also has some other acronyms that do mean the same; let’s start with those.

GSM (also known as gm/2) = grams per square meter and is the metric measurement of the weight of a fabric.

Metric measurements are generally the most common place but some clothing items are still marked in Imperial weights (OZ or oz/yd2 = ounces per yard squared)

The important thing to state here is that all of the terms above are measurements of weight, specifically the fabric weight when talking clothing. For example a t-shirt may be listed as 185gsm and another may be listed as 5.5oz the outcome is that these are basically the same as 5.5oz = 186gsm

You can work out any conversion of OZ & GSM by using the following calculation

5.5oz x 33.906 = 186.48gsm
185gsm / 33.906 = 5.45oz

The math is an important part of understanding the variations of fabric weight but in day to day buying you won’t want to pull out a calculator in a shop to work out what is what!!



So the main question you may have is “What is a good weight to buy?”

That will depend on what your needs are. Fabric weight is in almost all cases is a definition of the thickness of the garment itself. If you want a heavy t-shirt then a 180-200gsm item is generally at the very top end of a t-shirt weight, but if you want a nice lightweight summer t-shirt a 130-150 is also great. Likewise if you are looking for a cheap promotional t-shirt that may not be worn more than a few times a 100-110gsm t-shirt can be more than adequate.

Hoodies & Sweatshirts work on the same basis a thick winter hoodie can be 300-400gsm but a nice all year round weight can be 250-300gsm and a summer weight hoodie can be 200-250gsm.



Will a heavier weight T shirt / hoodie / sweatshirt last longer or better quality?

The answer to that really depends on you and what you want from your garment.  Will your customers wear it regularly (2-3 times a week)? If yes, then certainly I’d expect a heavier weight to last longer with all the extra washing and drying regular wear will mean. But I have many t-shirs that are 130-150gsm that have lasted for years with occasional wear.

As for the quality, that is such a wide range term that is always a matter of individual perspective. A designer t-shirt may cost $30 but only be 130gsm in weight and a “no brand” T shirt may cost $15 and be 190gsm.

But in general terms the higher the fabric weight most people would interpret to be better quality.



Does the higher the weight effect the price?

Yes; without a doubt. The higher the weight the more raw materials are used to weave the fabric in to its finished state ready for cutting and sewing.

What if there is no fabric weight in the listing I’m looking at?

To be honest there is no reason for the manufacturer or if looking it up in a catalog not to include the fabric weight of their clothing (especially if it’s a t-shirt, hoodie or sweatshirt) so in this situation it’s either the seller does not know or they do not want you to know?

If you’re looking at a t shirt, hoodie or sweatshirt and the GSM is not listed anywhere; ask the seller or manufacturer. If they don’t know or do not respond that would personally set off a red flag.

So in summary GSM is simply the fabric weight of a clothing item.

Source: http://www.customapparelsource.net/?p=516

Monday, February 22, 2016

F&F School Unisex V-Neck Jumper with As New Technology

Back To KnitwearF&F School Unisex V-Neck Jumper with As New Technology


£3.00 - £5.00
Navy
Blue
Size

This school jumper will keep their uniform polished and smart. Made from cotton which feels gentle on the skin, the V-neck jumper features As New technology which prolongs the life of the garment, keeping the colour for longer and reducing bobbling. Machine washable and tumble dry friendly for added convenience.

V-neck

Long sleeves

Source:http://www.clothingattesco.com/

Sunday, February 21, 2016

3 Bright Young Stars To Know From London Fashion Week

There is a lot to be said for young talent in the design world, especially when it comes to those looking to break into the London fashion scene. More so than the other mainstays (Paris, Milan, and New York), the focus on who's next, who's going to disrupt the mold, and who's creating clothing that isn't just fabric, but true art, sits heavily.

This notion was no more true than in the glorious stone hall of the Tate Britain early saturday morning, where three young stars — Richard Malone, Caitlin Price, and A.V. Robertson — were poised to host their first full-fledged runway shows. All received critical and commercial acclaim last season, winning the unofficial award of most 'grammed presentations. But how would their vision translate at such a grand setting for Lulu Kennedy's fall/winter 2016 Fashion East event?

First up was Richard Malone, making his second Fashion East outing. The opening look — a heavy, knitted pinafore dress that swept the ground — set the tone. Swimming-pool blues and sunshine yellows were the colors of choice, laid out in Brighton beach deck-chair stripes. It was a rather summery affair in all, but the technical yarns and layering made the collection a feasible winter offering. And hey, this is fashion, after all, and practicality rarely comes into play.

We were particularly taken, though, by the gentle ruffles on the backs of the garments, offering a cheeky peek of flesh; the turquoise zebra prints (inspired by Malone's godmother's outfit choice for his Holy Communion); and the modern, woolly fisherman overalls. Malone, a recipient of the LVMH Grand Prix scholarship, knows how to create an elegant and refined edit (as well as some seriously covetable footwear). There's no doubt those snowy white booties will be everywhere come next January.
Next was designer Caitlin Price. Having made a name for herself with super-luxe tracksuit-inspired clubwear, she presented a collection that was deeply enmeshed in nostalgia for London's early noughties garage scene. As the first model stepped out to Burial with a facial piercing, bare midriff, and track pants paired with a pink bustier, we saw Price take what she does best to the next level.

Flashes of colored silk and white fur adorned sportswear pieces and bubblegum pink jackets and skirts proved to be a cheeky take on the '90s office suit. The wonderfully cut black trousers with sashes dangling below and floor-dusting skirts arguably stole the show. As for the accessories, models carried mini bucket bags, wore Nikes, and had super-sized heart-shaped padlock necklaces (that looked like cartoonish versions of the Tiffany & Co. versions we pined for in middle school) tied around their necks.


The final look — a tongue-in-cheek take on a '90s bridal look — came in the form of a cropped white puffer jacket and billowing skirt. The image will, no doubt, flood your Instagram feed.
The last collection — and arguably the most anticipated (given the fact that Marc Jacobs was perched in the front row) — came courtesy of Amie Robertson, the designer behind A.V. Robertson and a protégé of Jacobs. With the help of top models Edie Campbell, Lineisy Montero, Anna Cleveland, Molly Bair, and Georgia May Jagger, she sent a gloriously glamorous girl down the runway with one simple message: Sit up and pay attention.

Inspired by extraterrestrial existence, the collection featured bold green knits, striped dresses and skirts with little embellishments, and purple satin blouses covered in a light dusting of "alien spores" (a.k.a. a cluster of winking crystals.) Despite the elegance factor, blazers hung off models' shoulders and tops gaped at the seams, presenting a kind of undone, disheveled magic.

With a collection (and It-Girl crew) like this, it's no surprise that Marc Jacobs nodded his head in approval. Well, he wasn't the only one who was impressed.

Source by:http://www.refinery29.com/2016/02/103680/fashion-east-fall-winter-lfw-2016-review

Saturday, February 20, 2016

HISTORY OF JEANS: FROM WORKPANTS TO HIGH FASHION

ves Saint-Laurent once stated that he wished he had invented blue jeans as jeans “are expressive and discreet, they have sex appeal and simplicity,-everything I could want for the clothes I design” (The Fashion Book, Levi Strauss Designer, 1998).

The purpose of this article is to examine the popularization of jeans since Levi Strauss invented the first blue jeans in the 1860s. A brief overview is provided to show how a garment that began as folk work clothes progressed over the years to become one of the most popular casual wear garb in modern society. What makes jeans so appealing is that they make no distinction between classes, sexes and age groups.

THE ORIGIN OF BLUE JEANS: LEVI STRAUSS
Levi Strauss, a pedlar who had immigrated to North America from Bavaria, followed the Gold Rush in California in the 1850s to sell his goods. The miners asked him for sturdy and durable work pants. With the help of a tailor, Strauss put together work pants that were supposedly made out of the canvas he had brought with him for the assembly of tents. In the 1860s, he began to fabricate pants made from heavyweight denim, and because the pants were dyed with indigo they were named “blue jeans”.

The original design of Levi Strauss blue jeans, Design 501, was influenced by the style of the loose trousers worn by Genoese sailors, a feature of which was the flared bottom to fit over work boots. Strauss selected a hardwearing fabric known as Serge de Nîmes (denim) which had gained popularity in France. Denim is heavy twill-woven cotton, a natural fiber that absorbs moisture quickly, dries quickly, and has a cooling effect when it is warm. Due to the expense of importing denim from France, Strauss likely obtained his supply from an American textile manufacturer (Dorner, 1974, p. 108-109; The Fashion Book, Levi Strauss Designer, 1998; Tortora & Eubank, 2010, p. 356).

The Levi jeans were dyed with indigo as it was cheap and plentiful since Guimet, a Frenchmen, invented an artificial indigo in 1826, and a synthetic indigo became available in 1876. Indigo produces a dark blue color which is long-lasting and maintains its color fastness when laundered (Boucher, 1973, p. 388).

To make Levi jeans more durable, copper rivets were added to reinforce the points of stress in strategic places such as on the pocket corners. This innovation helped to stop the weight of the gold nuggets from tearing the pockets. In 1873, rivets were placed at the bottom of the button fly to prevent it from ripping. That same year, the back pockets of the jeans were reinforced by adding stitching in the shape of a double arc design using orange thread. On May 20, 1874, Levi Strauss and his partner, Jacob Davis, received U.S. Patent 139,121, for an “Improvement in Fastening Pocket-Openings” (Dorner, 1974, p. 108-109; Tortora & Eubanks, 2010, p. 356; Wikipedia, Jeans).

The original Levi Jeans Design 501 did not undergo too many changes over the years, with the exception of becoming tighter fitting. In the 1960s, preshrunk jeans known as Levi Design 505, a regular fit jean with a zipper fly opening rather than a button fly, became available. This design was followed by a slim boot- cut jean with a normal waistline known as Levi Design 517, and then a lower waistline jean referred to as Levi Design 527. Since the 1970s, Strauss & Co. have produced trendy styles such as the loose, comfort, relaxed, slim, and skinny jeans (Harris & Johnston, 1971, p. 221; Wikipedia, Jeans).

EARLY MANUFACTURERS OF JEANS: 1890-1950
Levi jeans were popular with the working folk such as miners, lumberjacks, cowboys, ranchers, farmers, factory workers and laborers as the pants were reputed to be tough, hardwearing, functional, comfortable and affordable. The increasing demand for hardwearing denim pants, or jeans, resulted in two other early companies wanting to capture a share of the working-folk market, namely, the H.D. Lee Mercantile Company, established in Kansas, USA in 1898, and the Western Garment Company (GWG), founded in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, in 1911.

The Lee Company specialized in denim work wear, and by the 1950s they had expanded into casual wear. Since then, Lee Jeans have become popular worldwide (Lee Mercantile Company, 2014). The GWG Company originally started off by making hard-wearing clothing for the growing workforce. By the 1960s, GWG was producing casual denim clothing for the entire family. In 1963, Levis Strauss & Co. bought 75% of GWG (Cole, 2009; Wikipedia, GWG). Wrangler authentic western jeans appeared on the market in 1947, a brand that originated with Casey Jones who had acquired the Blue Bell Company a few years earlier. Wranglers were popular with the rodeo cowboys and cowgirls, and by 1996 one out of every five pairs of jeans sold in America featured a Wrangler label (Wrangler, 2014).
JEANS AS A LEVELER BETWEEN THE SEXES BEFORE 1960
Jeans had originally been designed as men’s work pants, but in the 1870s, Western women who worked along with men on ranches and farms began to wear men’s jeans. Savage (1996) refers to Willie Matthews, who in the 1870s outfitted herself in her brother’s clothes to get a job as a cowpuncher (p. 8). Laegreid (2006), who examined the gender role of women as cowgirls and rodeo royalty in the early 1900s, includes pictures in her book of cowgirls wearing jeans.

In 1930, Vogue magazine ran an advertisement depicting two society women in tight fitting jeans, a look that they called “Western chic.” By the mid-1930s, department stores were stocking Levis jeans and western boots in the women’s section. After World War II, jean manufacturers would offer a pant for women, similar to those of men, but with a side opening instead of a fly-front opening. It was not until 1958 that adjustments were made in the design of women’s jeans to account for the female shape, and in the 1960s, women’s jeans became available with the fly-front zipper opening (Dorner, 1974, p. 109; Lee Mercantile Company, 2014; Tortora & Eubank, 2010, p. 476).

According to Anspach (1971), women started to appropriate themselves of men’s jeans, first as symbols of revolt to level off the effect between the sexes, then as sports clothes, and later on as casual wear (p. 332).

JEANS WORN BY CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS BEFORE 1960
As early as the 1930s, children’s blue jeans were in demand by parents who wanted hard wearing play clothes and every day wear. Some children wore jeans to school, but the teachers complained that the rivets on the back pockets made holes in the wooden school seats. As a result, manufacturers discontinued using rivets on children’s pants. Few schools allowed children to wear blue jeans, so to capture the school- aged market, GWG introduced coloured denim jeans in the 1940s (Tortora & Eubank, 2010, p. 488).

After WW II, jeans became the uniform of most adolescent males, and adolescent girls began to dress up in boy’s blue jeans for casual dress. To distinguish themselves from the males, the girls would roll up their jeans and some of them would add a leather patch on their derriere (Anspach, 1971, p. 315). Jeans became symbols of affiliation of the young through their similarity in dress, and of wanting more freedom from sexual stereotypes and the restrictions of parental and societal values (Harris & Johnston, 1971, p. 221; Sproles & Burns, 1994, p. 195).

JEANS AS A SYMBOL OF YOUTH REBELLION, 1950s-1960s
Jeans became a hot item with the youth in the 1950s and early 1960s. In the 1950s, jeans were popularized and glamorized by James Dean and Marlon Brando in movies such as Rebel without a Cause, and Blue Denim. These movies presented rebellious youth dressed up in blue jeans, black leather motorbike jackets and white T-shirts. In the 1960s, counter-culture youth protesting against the establishment wore jeans as a uniform of their connection, or to demonstrate their solidarity with the working class. Young people would embroider designs on their jeans, or add patches and paint messages on them showing their group slogan or association (Browning, 2000; Laver, 2002, p. 260; Tortora & Eubank, 2010, p. 537).

JEANS AS MAINSTREAM CASUAL DRESS
In the 1960s, blue jeans were rare among adults and had not as yet been accepted in conventional places such as schools, restaurants, theaters, and offices. With improvements in the treatment of denim fabric by textile manufacturers over the years, and the creation of a number of jean styles to entice new customers, blue jeans would become a fashion staple in most people’s wardrobes by the 1980s. They also became a standard of casual and every day dress, even in offices. Jeans were generally worn with T-shirts or shirts, but for a dressier look men, for instance, would wear jeans with a sports jacket or a matching denim jacket, and with dressy shoes (Agins, 1999, p. 9; Browning, 2000; Laver, 2002, p. 47; Tortora & Eubank, 2010, p. 576).

INNOVATIONS IN THE TREATMENT OF DENIM SINCE THE 1960s
For many years the denim used in the fabrication of blue jeans was rather coarse and susceptible to shrinking making the garment unappealing as casual wear dress until textile manufacturers invented new processes and techniques to improve the fabric. Since the 1960s, innovations in the production of denim have resulted in the availability of:

-Preshrunk or pre-washed jeans.
-Permanent pressed jeans that do not wrinkle, regardless of how they are worn, and never need ironing. The permanent-press process basically involves treating the fabric with resins, then using a special treatment known as “hot head press” to bake the finish into the garment after it is cut and manufactured (Anspach, 1971, p. 315; Harris & Johnston, 1971, p. 221).
-Stretch denim jeans which give a form fitting fit. Briefly, the process involves combining spun elastane fibers that are composed of polyurethane filaments with other yarns (The Indian Textile Journal, 2012).
-Distressed or worn looking jeans. Different chemicals and techniques called stone-wash or acid-wash give denim a used and soft look, and special dyeing and finishing methods produce a faded or streaked look in a wide variety of colors. By 2002, specialty manufacturers were making replicas of well-worn jeans, and to make them look authentic they added worn spots, stains, tears, and repairs to the jeans (Tortora & Eubank, 2010, p. 601, 606; Wikipedia, Jeans).

The technological advances in the treatment of denim resulted in companies using blue denim and colored denim to make jackets, suits, shirts, shorts, and hats for the whole family, and women’s skirts. Even haute couture designers will use denim fabric in their collections to create daring and avant-garde attire (Laver, 2002, p. 262; Stone, 2008, p. 560; Tortora & Eubank, 2010, p. 606).

JEAN STYLES SINCE THE 1960s
After the 1960s, clothing manufacturers would introduce a variety of jean styles in retail stores to persuade the sexes and age groups to buy them (Harris & Johnston, 1971, p. 221; Tortora & Eubank, 2010, p. 570). Beginning in the 1970s, designer jeans would make their appearance in high-end shops. In 1970, Calvin Klein promoted his designer jeans as refined sportswear. In the 1980s, designers such as Gloria Vanderbilt, Ralph Lauren, and Jean-Paul Gaultier marketed their brands. Guess Inc., Jordach, and others would also cash in on the designer jeans boom. Some designer jeans could be quite fanciful. For instance, in the late 1990s, the Milanese house of Gucci presented feather-trim and feather embroidered jeans (Agins, 1999, p. 85, 119-120, 209; Laver, 2002, 282-283; Lee, 2003, p. 123, 165-166; Tortora & Eubank, 2010, p. 549).

There have been a number of notable jeans styles since the 1960s such as bell-bottom jeans, baggy jeans, distressed looking jeans, skin-tight jeans, and low-rise and peek-a-boo jeans, to name a few.

Bell-bottom Jeans. In 1969 bell-bottoms jeans were introduced on the market and became quite popular with men and women. However, the flared shape lost its appeal after a few years. This particular style made its reappearance in the 1990s for a short period of time (Browning, 2000; Tortora & Eubank, 2010, p. 643).

Baggy Jeans. Baggy jeans or saggy jeans became stylish with subculture groups, the hip hop set in the 1990s, and even the skateboarders. These pants were overly large in size. They were worn low on the hips revealing much of the underwear, and they sagged at the crotch level. Tommy Jeans featured a number of baggy styles that were favored by the hip-hop set. The baggy look did not hit mainstream (Agins, 1999, p. 121; Laver, 2002, p. 262; Tortora & Eubank, 2010, p. 608).

Distressed Jeans. Around the mid-1980s young people were dressing up as bohemians in beat-up looking jeans. They wore ripped jeans with leather jackets and T-shirts; they colored their hair in unusual colors and wore multiple earrings (The People History). Trend following clothing manufacturers noticed that young people were slashing their jeans themselves so they introduced jeans with a worn, torn, and faded look (Laver, 2001, p. 291; Tortora & Eubank, 2010, p. 606-607). But, the youth found the price of distressed jeans outrageous. The 1988 Lauren Double RL Jeans, for example, sold between $70 and $150, and as Agins (1999) points out young people could find worn and faded jeans at vintage clothing shops for a third of that price (p. 120). By 2002, companies were making authentic looking replicas of well-worn jeans with a price tag that ranged between $150 and $200, but retailers such as Gap would eventually offer distressed jeans for less than $50 (Tortora & Eubank, 2010, p. 601, 606; Wikipedia, Jeans).

Tight-fitting Jeans. Ralph Lauren tried to capture the western wear market in 1978 by offering an alternative design to the Wrangler and Lee jeans with his line of tight-fitting jeans. In 1979 the Buffalo label also came out with skin-tight jeans. Skin-tight jeans were sometimes worn at least two inches too small for a person’s waist, and getting into them was a struggle. Certain wearers would require assistance to get into them. The tightest fitting jeans in existence were referred to as French Jeans (Agins, 1999, p. 112, 119; Sproles & Burns, 1994, p. 155). In the early 1980s, the Gloria Vanderbuilt designer jeans that hugged a person’s derriere were the best-selling jeans in America (The Fashion Book, 1998, Gloria Vanderbuilt).

For men who wanted a bulging crotch to show underneath their skin-tight jeans, Lee Cooper released the Pack-it Jean in the 1970s. This trend was of a short duration, but the Pack-it Jean was re-released in 2001 (Lee, 2003, p. 166).

Low-rise and Peek-a-boo Jeans. In 1992 Alexander McQueen produced the Bumster jeans, tight-fitting pants with a waist that hung so low on the hips that the wearer’s rear cleavage was exposed. Baring the butt crack was a familiar sight in the 2000s. During that period of time Levis introduced its line of Dangerously Low jeans for women and men, and Old Navy was selling in its stores ultra-low-rise jeans. The lowest of the lows on the rise on a pair Frankie B. jeans was alleged to be just three inches whereas the regular cut Levi’s had a rise of ten inches. In the fall of 2001, Lee Cooper in the UK launched Butt Couture, a line of jeans made from lightweight denim designed intentionally with a gap between the waistband and the pants to create a peek-a-boo effect (Lee, 2003, p. 28-31).

Pop singers like Christian Aguilera, Madonna, Beyoncé Knowles and Britney Spears are known for having worn jeans so low and snug while dancing that people were concerned that they would pop right out of their jeans or bust a seam (Lee, 2003, p. 28-31). Although some pop stars may look very sexy in their tight jeans, the consumer must be aware that not all jean styles and fads may compliment their figure. The Marquis of Fashion stresses this point in “Malicious Mom Bum and How to avoid it”.

Lee (2003) refers to medical evidence in her book that has led some doctors to conclude that tight-fitting jeans can create health problems. Doctors noticed, for example, that when the men who had complained of stomach problems, including heartburn and distension switched to baggy pants their symptoms disappeared. In the case of women, the wearing of tight pants can result in endometriosis, one of the top three causes of female infertility. In addition, tight waists may also cause a number of vascular problems. Lee concludes that, “It goes to show that Fashion Victims can fall for the most uncomfortable trends, like skintight jeans” (p, 224-225).

CONCLUSION
In the past, blue jeans were identified with the American folk culture, but since the 1970s they have become an increasingly popular article of casual dress around the world. They are worn in business, government, professional offices, educational institutions, and in most public places. Jeans are one of the most simple, versatile, and enduring garments in modern society because they make no distinction between classes, sexes, and age groups. But, as Sproles & Burns (1994) point out, social saturation sets in, and some fashions or styles fade in popularity and are usually replaced with new trends that encourage people to buy unnecessarily the new designs (p. 171).